Delivery Definition
A bounded investigation before committing to delivery. Optional, separately priced, and worth buying only when unresolved technical or process questions genuinely prevent a reliable quote.
- Optional
- Around five days' effort
- Fixed fee

- Investigate
- Evidence
- Decide
One proposed change, a named set of questions, and a fixed fee against the investigation and its outputs.
- Purchase trigger
- Named uncertainties require substantive investigation before delivery can responsibly be quoted
- Unit of scope
- One proposed business outcome, one workstream, up to three named questions
- Standard boundary
- Up to three named systems, with the specific repositories, workbook versions, documents and samples listed in the agreement
- Participation
- One accountable owner on your side, a kickoff, up to three one-hour stakeholder sessions and one readout
- Effort and schedule
- Around five working days of effort inside ten working days of the prerequisites being ready, with dates agreed before you buy
- Investigation
- The agreed evidence reviewed, the process or flow mapped, dependencies examined and the named assumptions tested
- Feasibility testing
- Only a specifically described probe agreed in advance, run in an approved non-production environment
- Output
- An editable decision pack, an evidence register, diagrams, acceptance criteria and delivery options
- Pricing
- A fixed fee for the agreed investigation and its outputs, with implementation quoted separately
The most common shape of this is a spreadsheet the business quietly runs on. From Spreadsheet to System
It does not guarantee a fixed-price build quote. "The interface remains undocumented, so a bounded implementation quote is not responsible" is a valid outcome, provided the agreed investigation was done and the evidence supports it.
- Production changes, implementation or migration execution
- Exhaustive discovery of undocumented rules
- Full-estate assessment
- Penetration testing
- Regulatory certification
- Procurement management
- Ongoing support
- Responsibility for another supplier's cooperation
The Azure Well-Architected Review is a separate purchase answering a different decision: whether one workload can go live, or be accepted into operations, by a named date. The Azure Well-Architected Review in full
- What does it cost?
- A fixed fee for the agreed investigation and its outputs, quoted after a short call - never open-ended. Implementation is a separate purchase, priced separately, and the investigation fee is not credited against later work. You pay once for the work that is done.
- What if we do not commission the build?
- Nothing further is owed. The pack is editable and yours, and it is written so your own team or another supplier can act on it without DBHQ.
- Do you do the implementation too?
- Where it fits. A Production Delivery Sprint is a separate engagement with its own fixed price, and buying the investigation does not commit you to one.
- What if the answer is that it still cannot be quoted?
- Then that is the finding, and it is the one you paid for. "The interface remains undocumented, so a bounded implementation quote is not responsible" is a real answer - it names what would have to change before anyone could price the work honestly.
- What access do you need?
- Read-only, over the repositories, workbook versions, documents and samples named in the agreement. Nothing in your live environment is changed. Where a question can only be settled by trying something, that probe is described in advance and run in an approved non-production environment.
- How long does it take?
- Around five working days of effort, inside ten working days of the prerequisites being ready. The dates are agreed before you buy.
- Who owns what you produce?
- You do, on payment - the pack, the diagrams and any probe code commissioned with it, with rights that let your own team or another supplier use and modify them. DBHQ keeps its own pre-existing tools and methods.
Fifteen minutes will tell you if this fits
Bring the problem - the stalled pilot, the systems that do not talk, the manual process eating your team. You will get a straight answer on whether it is sprint-shaped, roughly what it would cost, and when it could be running.
I reply within 24 hours